|Titel||Attrition in web-based treatment for problem drinkers.|
|Jaar van publicatie||2011|
|Auteurs||Postel MG, de Haan HA, Ter Huurne ED, van der Palen J, Becker ES, DeJong CA|
|Uitgave||J Med Internet Res|
|Trefwoorden||Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Internet, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Telemedicine, Young Adult|
BACKGROUND: Web-based interventions for problem drinking are effective but characterized by high rates of attrition. There is a need to better understand attrition rates in order to improve the completion rates and the success of Web-based treatment programs. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to (1) examine attrition prevalence and pretreatment predictors of attrition in a sample of open-access users of a Web-based program for problem drinkers, and (2) to further explore attrition data from our randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Web-based program. METHODS: Attrition data from two groups of Dutch-speaking problem drinkers were collected: (1) open-access participants enrolled in the program in 2009 (n = 885), and (2) RCT participants (n = 156). Participants were classified as noncompleters if they did not complete all 12 treatment sessions (9 assignments and 3 assessments). In both samples we assessed prevalence of attrition and pretreatment predictors of treatment completion. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore predictors of treatment completion. In the RCT sample, we additionally measured reasons for noncompletion and participants' suggestions to enhance treatment adherence. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The open-access and RCT group differed significantly in the percentage of treatment completers (273/780, 35.0% vs 65/144, 45%, χ(2) (1) = 5.4, P = .02). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant contribution of treatment readiness, gender, education level, age, baseline alcohol consumption, and readiness to change to predict treatment completion. The key reasons for noncompletion were personal reasons, dissatisfaction with the intervention, and satisfaction with their own improvement. The main suggestions for boosting strategies involved email notification and more flexibility in the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The challenge of Web-based alcohol treatment programs no longer seems to be their effectiveness but keeping participants involved until the end of the treatment program. Further research should investigate whether the suggested strategies to improve adherence decrease attrition rates in Web-based interventions. If we can succeed in improving attrition rates, the success of Web-based alcohol interventions will also improve and, as a consequence, their public health impact will increase. TRIAL: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 39104853; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN39104853 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/63IKDul1T).
|Alternatieve uitgave||J. Med. Internet Res.|